Note: I’ve taken down the initial photo I had, which I thought was too vulgar, and replaced it with a picture of the billboard as it appeared only a few hours after it was put up.
What’s hard to believe, at least for me, is that the above billboard was sponsored by a church. H/T: BBC News:
An unholy row has broken out in New Zealand over a church billboard aimed at “challenging stereotypes” about the birth of Jesus Christ.
A dejected-looking Joseph lies in bed next to Mary under the caption, “Poor Joseph. God was a hard act to follow”.
St Matthew-in-the-City Church in Auckland, which erected the billboard, said it had intended to provoke debate.
But the Catholic Church, among others, has condemned it as “inappropriate” and “disrespectful”.
Within hours of its unveiling, the billboard had been defaced with brown paint.
The church’s vicar, Archdeacon Glynn Cardy, said the aim of the billboard had been to lampoon the literal interpretation of the Christmas conception story. “What we’re trying to do is to get people to think more about what Christmas is all about,” he told the New Zealand Press Association (NZPA).
“Is it about a spiritual male God sending down sperm so a child would be born, or is it about the power of love in our midst as seen in Jesus?”
He told NZPA that the church had received e-mails and phone calls about the controversial image.
“About 50% said they loved it, and about 50% said it was terribly offensive,” he said. “But that’s out of about 20 responses – this is New Zealand.”
But Lyndsay Freer, spokeswoman for the Catholic Diocese of Auckland, said the poster was offensive to Christians.
“Our Christian tradition of 2,000 years is that Mary remains a virgin and that Jesus is the son of God, not Joseph,” she told the New Zealand Herald. “Such a poster is inappropriate and disrespectful.”
The family values group Family First said any debate about the Virgin birth should be held inside the church.
“To confront children and families with the concept as a street billboard is completely irresponsible and unnecessary,” Family First director Bob McCroskrie told the news website stuff.co.nz.
AGAIN AND AGAIN 
With respect to Christmas and the birth of Christ, I believe this billboard is irresponsible, disgusting, and sacrilegious. The priest responsible for this billboard needs to be reprimanded fast — perhaps even defrocked.
Yes, “a church”. Thanks.
It was sponsored by “a church”.
Sad and disgusting.
I’d be interested to hear the response to this from conservative protestant religious leaders who do not hold to the ever-virginity of the Theotokos. It is that theology, after all, that lays the groundwork for such things.